Skip to content
All articles
AI & Models1 min read

The $157B OpenAI Valuation Bull Case

Mikey & Colin

Co-Founders

The $157B OpenAI Valuation Bull Case

A few weeks ago, we heard about OpenAI’s valuation: $157 billion.

One hundred and fifty-seven billion dollars. Eye-wateringly ludicrous—or is it?

We began racking our brains. Could the AI revolution be led by Sam Altman and the team at OpenAI? Could this actually be a discount for what might become this generation’s printing press, semiconductor, or internet? Or is it grossly overvalued? Are we looking at this generation’s MySpace—a first mover that will eventually fizzle out as challengers rise to become incumbents?

This week, we’re doing something a little different. Michael Brown will make the case that OpenAI is fairly valued, while Colin Ryan will argue the opposite. On Thursday, after publishing both sides, we’ll attach a poll to get your opinion: Is OpenAI overvalued or undervalued?

The Bull Case – In just two months, OpenAI reached 100 million users—faster than Facebook’s historic adoption curve. Facebook revolutionized network effects, and OpenAI is driving even greater AI-driven adoption, reflected in soaring valuation multiples.

As of September 2024, the median EV/Revenue multiple for AI companies is 25.8x. OpenAI’s projected FY 2024 revenue of $3.7 billion (Yahoo! Finance) implies a $95.5 billion enterprise value—short of its $157 billion valuation. However, multiples alone miss key drivers like company fundamentals and market sentiment, which reflects investor confidence in future potential.
Valuing ventures is often more art than science. Traditional multiples fail to capture OpenAI’s profound societal impact, as AI models challenge search engines, teach complex topics, and reshape jobs. This is not just innovation—it’s a societal revolution, comparable to the Industrial Revolution, which, in its day, evolved valuation methods from tangible assets to forward-looking metrics.

Today, EV/Revenue multiples dominate, but even 25.8x underscores OpenAI’s first-mover advantage and disruptive potential. The bull case is clear: at a $157 billion valuation, investors see a bargain, reflecting confidence in OpenAI’s ability to transform industries and societal norms. This valuation represents fair market value, driven by sentiment, expectations, and unmatched potential.

Mentioned in this piece

  • AI & Models8 min read

    Why AI Needs Open Models

    Open-source AI gives startups, developers and businesses an alternative to relying entirely on a small group of closed model providers. Restricting access to open models could reduce competition, increase costs and limit how companies build and deploy AI, while doing little to stop the technology from advancing elsewhere. That matters even more as the model itself becomes just one component of a larger system that increasingly determines how useful an AI product actually is.

  • The Kimi logo — a rounded black tile holding a white K with a blue dot, beside the KIMI wordmark in white.
    AI & Models4 min read

    Kimi K3

    DeepSeek showed that frontier-level intelligence could be built and served far more efficiently than the market expected. Kimi K3 takes that disruption further by combining competitive performance with open weights, giving developers and enterprises more control over how models are hosted, customized and deployed. The right response is not to restrict access, but to build stronger open alternatives and compete in a model market that is becoming cheaper, more open and far less defensible.

VE Weekly

The week in tech, AI and early-stage capital.

One send a week. Whole pieces, not a digest of links out.

One email a week. Unsubscribe in one click. Your address is never shared.