Skip to content
All articles
AI & Models1 min read

The $157B OpenAI Valuation Bear Case

Mikey & Colin

Co-Founders

The $157B OpenAI Valuation Bear Case

The OpenAI Bear Case – With a 2024 revenue run rate of $3.7 billion, OpenAI is currently valued at a staggering 42x multiple—quite the premium, even for what is a trillion-dollar market.

While OpenAI may be a leader today, its valuation feels detached from financial and operational fundamentals. Here's why:

1️⃣ OpenAI lacks a durable technical moat. While it may currently have the best developer ecosystem and APIs, this advantage is fleeting.

2️⃣ OpenAI’s significant infrastructure spending suggests it is keeping pace with, rather than outpacing, a rapidly commoditizing market. Token pricing for GPT-4 has dropped 98% since last year.

This is a pricing race to the bottom—one that rarely paves the path to profitability.

3️⃣ Competition is amplified by open-source and big tech players like Meta and Google. OpenAI, ironically not open-source, now faces rival models that outperform it in specific use cases and distribution channels.

Meta’s Llama 3, for example, reaches 1.1 billion users across platforms like WhatsApp, Instagram, and Facebook, compared to ChatGPT’s 23% adoption among U.S. adults.

By embedding AI natively into their vast ecosystems, Meta and Google threaten OpenAI’s standalone model, even with Apple partnerships.

4️⃣ Finally, leadership instability, to put it lightly, adds to concerns. OpenAI’s high turnover—eight of its eleven co-founders, including CTO Mira Murati and Chief Scientist Ilya Sutskever, have departed to launch competitors.

AI is in its dawn, and like MySpace in social media's early days, OpenAI’s valuation risks overhyping potential—a cautionary tale for emerging industries.

So, what do you think? At $157 billion, is OpenAI overvalued or undervalued?

Mentioned in this piece

  • AI & Models8 min read

    Why AI Needs Open Models

    Open-source AI gives startups, developers and businesses an alternative to relying entirely on a small group of closed model providers. Restricting access to open models could reduce competition, increase costs and limit how companies build and deploy AI, while doing little to stop the technology from advancing elsewhere. That matters even more as the model itself becomes just one component of a larger system that increasingly determines how useful an AI product actually is.

  • The Kimi logo — a rounded black tile holding a white K with a blue dot, beside the KIMI wordmark in white.
    AI & Models4 min read

    Kimi K3

    DeepSeek showed that frontier-level intelligence could be built and served far more efficiently than the market expected. Kimi K3 takes that disruption further by combining competitive performance with open weights, giving developers and enterprises more control over how models are hosted, customized and deployed. The right response is not to restrict access, but to build stronger open alternatives and compete in a model market that is becoming cheaper, more open and far less defensible.

VE Weekly

The week in tech, AI and early-stage capital.

One send a week. Whole pieces, not a digest of links out.

One email a week. Unsubscribe in one click. Your address is never shared.